Luong Anh Tuan 831103935b Remove xrange for run both Python 2 and Python 3 ... In python 3, range() does what xrange() used to do and xrange() does not exist. If you want to write code that will run on both Python 2 and Python 3, you can't use xrange(). range() can actually be faster in some cases - eg. if iterating over the same sequence multiple times. xrange() has to reconstruct the integer object every time, but range() will have real integer objects. (It will always perform worse in terms of memory however) xrange() isn't usable in all cases where a real list is needed. For instance, it doesn't support slices, or any list methods. Change-Id: I033289359882c08185d59d13fa0b994c4566185a		2016-10-12 12:39:30 +07:00
..
config_template	Add option to toggle list extensions	2016-09-09 16:15:00 -05:00
dist_sort	Remove xrange for run both Python 2 and Python 3	2016-10-12 12:39:30 +07:00
glance	Deserialize glance image_properties	2016-09-06 14:02:43 -07:00
keystone	Provide type for boolean module parameters	2016-05-31 14:12:11 -07:00
magnum	Adding Magnum plugin	2016-09-30 10:29:08 -05:00
memcached	Remove xrange for run both Python 2 and Python 3	2016-10-12 12:39:30 +07:00
name2int	first commit	2016-01-25 18:07:53 -06:00
neutron	Provide type for boolean module parameters	2016-05-31 14:12:11 -07:00
provider_networks	Support more than one flat network	2016-09-28 14:39:10 +02:00