Cleanup FAQ somewhat
Remove some old discussions that no longer seem relevant and cleanup a few other points. Change-Id: I175ddaf9362bf48d35b0e648904eeb21bdc3c793
This commit is contained in:
parent
21b7e975fa
commit
a16e46100a
@ -10,36 +10,21 @@ General Questions
|
||||
=================
|
||||
|
||||
Q: Can I use DevStack for production?
|
||||
A: No. We mean it. Really. DevStack makes some implementation
|
||||
choices that are not appropriate for production deployments. We
|
||||
warned you!
|
||||
Q: Then why selinux in enforcing mode?
|
||||
A: That is the default on current Fedora and RHEL releases. DevStack
|
||||
has (rightly so) a bad reputation for its security practices; it has
|
||||
always been meant as a development tool first and system integration
|
||||
later. This is changing as the security issues around OpenStack's
|
||||
use of root (for example) have been tightened and developers need to
|
||||
be better equipped to work in these environments. ``stack.sh``'s use
|
||||
of root is primarily to support the activities that would be handled
|
||||
by packaging in "real" deployments. To remove additional protections
|
||||
that will be desired/required in production would be a step
|
||||
backward.
|
||||
Q: But selinux is disabled in RHEL!
|
||||
A: Today it is, yes. That is a specific exception that certain
|
||||
DevStack contributors fought strongly against. The primary reason it
|
||||
was allowed was to support using RHEL6 as the Python 2.6 test
|
||||
platform and that took priority time-wise. This will not be the case
|
||||
with RHEL 7.
|
||||
|
||||
A: DevStack is targeted at developers and CI systems to use the
|
||||
raw upstream code. It makes many choices that are not appropriate
|
||||
for production systems.
|
||||
|
||||
Your best choice is probably to choose a `distribution of
|
||||
OpenStack
|
||||
<https://www.openstack.org/marketplace/distros>`__.
|
||||
|
||||
Q: Why a shell script, why not chef/puppet/...
|
||||
A: The script is meant to be read by humans (as well as ran by
|
||||
computers); it is the primary documentation after all. Using a
|
||||
recipe system requires everyone to agree and understand chef or
|
||||
puppet.
|
||||
Q: Why not use Crowbar?
|
||||
A: DevStack is optimized for documentation & developers. As some of
|
||||
us use `Crowbar <https://github.com/dellcloudedge/crowbar>`__ for
|
||||
production deployments, we hope developers documenting how they
|
||||
setup systems for new features supports projects like Crowbar.
|
||||
|
||||
Q: I'd like to help!
|
||||
A: That isn't a question, but please do! The source for DevStack is
|
||||
at
|
||||
@ -49,27 +34,23 @@ Q: I'd like to help!
|
||||
follow the usual process as described in the `developer
|
||||
guide <http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/developers.html>`__. This Sphinx
|
||||
documentation is housed in the doc directory.
|
||||
|
||||
Q: Why not use packages?
|
||||
A: Unlike packages, DevStack leaves your cloud ready to develop -
|
||||
checkouts of the code and services running in screen. However, many
|
||||
people are doing the hard work of packaging and recipes for
|
||||
production deployments. We hope this script serves as a way to
|
||||
communicate configuration changes between developers and packagers.
|
||||
production deployments.
|
||||
|
||||
Q: Why isn't $MY\_FAVORITE\_DISTRO supported?
|
||||
A: DevStack is meant for developers and those who want to see how
|
||||
OpenStack really works. DevStack is known to run on the
|
||||
distro/release combinations listed in ``README.md``. DevStack is
|
||||
only supported on releases other than those documented in
|
||||
``README.md`` on a best-effort basis.
|
||||
Q: What about Fedora/RHEL/CentOS?
|
||||
A: Fedora and CentOS/RHEL are supported via rpm dependency files and
|
||||
specific checks in ``stack.sh``. Support will follow the pattern set
|
||||
with the Ubuntu testing, i.e. only a single release of the distro
|
||||
will receive regular testing, others will be handled on a
|
||||
best-effort basis.
|
||||
Q: Are there any differences between Ubuntu and Fedora support?
|
||||
A: Neutron is not fully supported prior to Fedora 18 due lack of
|
||||
OpenVSwitch packages.
|
||||
|
||||
Q: Are there any differences between Ubuntu and Centos/Fedora support?
|
||||
A: Both should work well and are tested by DevStack CI.
|
||||
|
||||
Q: Why can't I use another shell?
|
||||
A: DevStack now uses some specific bash-ism that require Bash 4, such
|
||||
as associative arrays. Simple compatibility patches have been accepted
|
||||
@ -77,26 +58,23 @@ Q: Why can't I use another shell?
|
||||
compatibility patches will be considered except for shells matching
|
||||
the array functionality as it is very ingrained in the repo and project
|
||||
management.
|
||||
Q: But, but, can't I test on OS/X?
|
||||
A: Yes, even you, core developer who complained about this, needs to
|
||||
install bash 4 via homebrew to keep running tests on OS/X. Get a Real
|
||||
Operating System. (For most of you who don't know, I am referring to
|
||||
myself.)
|
||||
|
||||
Q: Can I test on OS/X?
|
||||
A: Some people have success with bash 4 installed via
|
||||
homebrew to keep running tests on OS/X.
|
||||
|
||||
Operation and Configuration
|
||||
===========================
|
||||
|
||||
Q: Can DevStack handle a multi-node installation?
|
||||
A: Indirectly, yes. You run DevStack on each node with the
|
||||
appropriate configuration in ``local.conf``. The primary
|
||||
considerations are turning off the services not required on the
|
||||
secondary nodes, making sure the passwords match and setting the
|
||||
various API URLs to the right place.
|
||||
A: Yes, see :doc:`multinode lab guide <guides/multinode-lab>`
|
||||
|
||||
Q: How can I document the environment that DevStack is using?
|
||||
A: DevStack includes a script (``tools/info.sh``) that gathers the
|
||||
versions of the relevant installed apt packages, pip packages and
|
||||
git repos. This is a good way to verify what Python modules are
|
||||
installed.
|
||||
|
||||
Q: How do I turn off a service that is enabled by default?
|
||||
A: Services can be turned off by adding ``disable_service xxx`` to
|
||||
``local.conf`` (using ``n-vol`` in this example):
|
||||
@ -113,31 +91,22 @@ Q: Is enabling a service that defaults to off done with the reverse of the above
|
||||
enable_service qpid
|
||||
|
||||
Q: How do I run a specific OpenStack milestone?
|
||||
A: OpenStack milestones have tags set in the git repo. Set the appropriate tag in the ``*_BRANCH`` variables in ``local.conf``. Swift is on its own release schedule so pick a tag in the Swift repo that is just before the milestone release. For example:
|
||||
A: OpenStack milestones have tags set in the git repo. Set the
|
||||
appropriate tag in the ``*_BRANCH`` variables in ``local.conf``.
|
||||
Swift is on its own release schedule so pick a tag in the Swift repo
|
||||
that is just before the milestone release. For example:
|
||||
|
||||
::
|
||||
|
||||
[[local|localrc]]
|
||||
GLANCE_BRANCH=stable/juno
|
||||
HORIZON_BRANCH=stable/juno
|
||||
KEYSTONE_BRANCH=stable/juno
|
||||
NOVA_BRANCH=stable/juno
|
||||
GLANCE_BRANCH=stable/juno
|
||||
NEUTRON_BRANCH=stable/juno
|
||||
SWIFT_BRANCH=2.2.1
|
||||
GLANCE_BRANCH=stable/kilo
|
||||
HORIZON_BRANCH=stable/kilo
|
||||
KEYSTONE_BRANCH=stable/kilo
|
||||
NOVA_BRANCH=stable/kilo
|
||||
GLANCE_BRANCH=stable/kilo
|
||||
NEUTRON_BRANCH=stable/kilo
|
||||
SWIFT_BRANCH=2.3.0
|
||||
|
||||
Q: Why not use [STRIKEOUT:``tools/pip-requires``]\ ``requirements.txt`` to grab project dependencies?
|
||||
[STRIKEOUT:The majority of deployments will use packages to install
|
||||
OpenStack that will have distro-based packages as dependencies.
|
||||
DevStack installs as many of these Python packages as possible to
|
||||
mimic the expected production environment.] Certain Linux
|
||||
distributions have a 'lack of workaround' in their Python
|
||||
configurations that installs vendor packaged Python modules and
|
||||
pip-installed modules to the SAME DIRECTORY TREE. This is causing
|
||||
heartache and moving us in the direction of installing more modules
|
||||
from PyPI than vendor packages. However, that is only being done as
|
||||
necessary as the packaging needs to catch up to the development
|
||||
cycle anyway so this is kept to a minimum.
|
||||
Q: What can I do about RabbitMQ not wanting to start on my fresh new VM?
|
||||
A: This is often caused by ``erlang`` not being happy with the
|
||||
hostname resolving to a reachable IP address. Make sure your
|
||||
@ -145,6 +114,7 @@ Q: What can I do about RabbitMQ not wanting to start on my fresh new VM?
|
||||
in ``/etc/hosts`` is often good enough for a single-node
|
||||
installation. And in an extreme case, use ``clean.sh`` to eradicate
|
||||
it and try again.
|
||||
|
||||
Q: How can I set up Heat in stand-alone configuration?
|
||||
A: Configure ``local.conf`` thusly:
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user