Fix typo in candidacy
Change-Id: Iaae594aeddd2cb18e27dbdcd3e5b1e095d39745e
This commit is contained in:
parent
5a1ded938d
commit
08f5f7005c
@ -2,11 +2,12 @@ Dear all,
|
||||
|
||||
I'd like to announce my candidacy for a seat on the OpenStack Technical
|
||||
Committee.
|
||||
I have been in this community since 2014. And been deeply involved with
|
||||
technical contribution [1], mostly around Orchestration service which allows
|
||||
me to work on integration and management resources cross-projects. Also, I
|
||||
have served as PTL for three cycles. Which allows me to learn better on how
|
||||
we can join users and operators' experiences and requirements and integrated
|
||||
I'm Rico Lin, employed by EasyStack, full-time OpenStacker. I have been in
|
||||
this community since 2014. And been deeply involved with technical
|
||||
contribution [1], mostly around Orchestration service which allows me to
|
||||
work on integration and management resources cross-projects. Also, I have
|
||||
served as PTL for three cycles. Which allows me to learn better on how we
|
||||
can join users and operators' experiences and requirements and integrated
|
||||
with development workflow and technical decision processes.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -14,11 +15,11 @@ Here are my major goals with this seat in TC:
|
||||
|
||||
- Application:
|
||||
We've updated our resolution with [3] and saying we care about what
|
||||
application needs on top of OpenStack. As for jobs from few projects are
|
||||
taking the role and thinking about what application needs, we should provides
|
||||
applications needs on top of OpenStack. As for jobs from few projects are
|
||||
taking the role and thinking about what application needs, we should provide
|
||||
help with setting up community goals, making resolutions, or define what are
|
||||
top priority applications (can be a shor term definition) we needs to focus on
|
||||
and taking action items/guidelines and finding weakness, so others from
|
||||
top priority applications (can be a short-term definition) we need to focus on
|
||||
and taking action items/guidelines and finding weaknesses, so others from
|
||||
community can follow (if they agree with the goals, but got no idea on what
|
||||
they can help, IMO this will be a good stuff).
|
||||
|
||||
@ -26,7 +27,7 @@ they can help, IMO this will be a good stuff).
|
||||
We have been losing some communication cross Users, Operators, and Developers.
|
||||
And it's never a good thing when users can share use cases, ops shares
|
||||
experiences, developers shares code, but they won't make it to one another not
|
||||
if a user provide developers by them self. In this case, works like StoryBoard
|
||||
if a user provides developers by them self. In this case, works like StoryBoard
|
||||
should be in our first priority. We need a more solid way to get user feedback
|
||||
for developers, so we can actually learn what's working or not for each
|
||||
feature. And maybe it's considerable, to strengthen the communication between
|
||||
@ -34,20 +35,20 @@ TCs and UCs (User Committee).
|
||||
|
||||
- Diversity:
|
||||
The math is easy. [2] shows we got around one-third of users from Asia (with
|
||||
75% of users in China). Also IIRC, around same percentage of developers.
|
||||
But we got 0 in TC. The actual works are hard. We needs forwards our
|
||||
75% of users in China). Also IIRC, around the same percentage of developers.
|
||||
But we got 0 in TC. The actual works are hard. We need forwards our
|
||||
technical guideline to developers in Asia and provide chances to get more
|
||||
feedback from them, so we can provides better technical resolutions which
|
||||
feedback from them, so we can provide better technical resolutions which
|
||||
should be able to tight developers all together. Which I think I'm a good
|
||||
candidate for this.
|
||||
|
||||
- Reach out for new blood:
|
||||
With cloud getting more mature. It's normal that cloud developers needs to
|
||||
With cloud getting more mature. It's normal that cloud developers need to
|
||||
works in multiple communities, and they might comes and goes (mostly based
|
||||
on their job definition from their enterprise), so we need more new
|
||||
developers. And most important is to provides more chances for them to stay.
|
||||
Which I know there are many new join developers struggle with finding ways
|
||||
to fit in each project. We needs ways to shorten their onboarding time, so
|
||||
to fit in each project. We need ways to shorten their onboarding time, so
|
||||
they can make good works during they're in our community.
|
||||
|
||||
- Paying the debt:
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user