Adding Rossella Sblendido candidacy for Neutron
This is the official candidacy of Rossella Sblendido for the PTL role for Neutron for the Mitaka release cycle. Change-Id: Ie7ed7dba767c8f3aea7e65940736148ff79f50e4
This commit is contained in:
parent
d4364047d6
commit
271c8c8194
56
candidates/mitaka/Neutron/Rossella_Sblendido.txt
Normal file
56
candidates/mitaka/Neutron/Rossella_Sblendido.txt
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
|
||||
Hi everyone,
|
||||
|
||||
I decided to run for the Neutron PTL position for the Mitaka release cycle.
|
||||
|
||||
I have been contributing to Neutron since Havana and I am a member of the
|
||||
control plane core review team. During these years I have touched most parts
|
||||
of the Neutron code and in the last cycle my main focus has been
|
||||
to restructure the OVS agent, adding the ability to use events provided by
|
||||
ovsdb client and making it more resilient to failures.
|
||||
|
||||
Mentoring people and spreading knowledge about Neutron have been high
|
||||
priorities for me in these years. I am a regular speaker at OpenStack events
|
||||
(local meetups, Openstack days and summits), where my talks have had high
|
||||
attendance and good feedback.
|
||||
I have been a mentor for the Outreachy program [1] and the OpenStack upstream
|
||||
training.
|
||||
|
||||
If I become PTL these are my main objectives for Mitaka:
|
||||
|
||||
* Make the community even more welcoming.
|
||||
Neutron is still facing a big challenge in terms of review bandwidth.
|
||||
Good features can't get merged because of this limit. Even if the introduction
|
||||
of the Lieutenant system [2] has improved scalability, we still need to create
|
||||
a better way to share knowledge.
|
||||
In addition to improving the existing documentations and tutorials I'd like to
|
||||
create a team of mentors that can help new contributors (the quality of the
|
||||
proposed patches should increase so that the review time needed to merge them
|
||||
should decrease) and form new reviewers (more good people, more bandwidth).
|
||||
|
||||
* Keep working hard to increase the stability.
|
||||
The introduction of functional tests and full stack tests was great, we just
|
||||
need to keep going in that direction. Moreover I'd love to produce and store
|
||||
some benchmark data so that we can also keep track of the performance of
|
||||
Neutron during time.
|
||||
|
||||
* Continue getting feedback from operators.
|
||||
I think it's very important to hear the opinions of the actual Neutron users
|
||||
and to understand their concerns.
|
||||
|
||||
* Paying down technical debt
|
||||
Introduce oslo versioned objects to improve RPC and keep refactoring Neutron
|
||||
code to make it more readable and understandable.
|
||||
|
||||
Before proposing my candidacy I made sure I have the full support of my employer
|
||||
for this role.
|
||||
|
||||
Neutron has a great team of contributors and great leaders, it would be an
|
||||
honor for me to be able to coordinate our efforts and push Neutron forward.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks for reading so far and for considering this candidacy,
|
||||
|
||||
Rossella (rossella_s)
|
||||
|
||||
[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Outreachy
|
||||
[2] http://docs.openstack.org/developer/neutron/policies/core-reviewers.html#core-review-hierarchy
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user