Adding amrith candidacy for TC
Change-Id: I3c02981e57982abb93fa2c87f9091c73e310e699
This commit is contained in:
parent
aa4f0ec64b
commit
5cfd5981e4
60
candidates/pike/TC/amrith.txt
Normal file
60
candidates/pike/TC/amrith.txt
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
|
||||
Candidacy for OpenStack Technical Committee
|
||||
|
||||
My name is Amrith Kumar, I've been around OpenStack since a little
|
||||
before the IceHouse release (about 3 years ago). During this time,
|
||||
I've worked mostly on Trove, and a little bit on other projects but
|
||||
mostly in service of Trove. I've also served as a member of the
|
||||
Stewardship Working Group, and have participated in other activities
|
||||
that seek to foster and encourage participation in OpenStack
|
||||
(mentorship, for example).
|
||||
|
||||
I submit my candidacy for election to the TC at what I believe we will
|
||||
look back upon as a point of inflection in the OpenStack trajectory.
|
||||
|
||||
Trove, the project that I've been most closely associated with, and
|
||||
some other projects that are not part of the 'core OpenStack' have
|
||||
faced a decline in participation. To be clear, I don't intend to place
|
||||
blame on the 'big tent' proposal; I think the approach proposed in the
|
||||
big tent was rational and needed at the time. The old way of doing
|
||||
things was unsustainable and the new model is much more
|
||||
scalable. However, it is an observable fact that the non-core projects
|
||||
have seen a decline in participation as more corporate focus is placed
|
||||
on the few core projects.
|
||||
|
||||
At this point of inflection, I think the TC should focus more of its
|
||||
attention on three specific things that I promise to champion if
|
||||
elected to the TC. I describe each in turn below.
|
||||
|
||||
I would like to make it easier for newcomers to OpenStack to
|
||||
participate in the project, and I will make this a priority on the
|
||||
Technical Committee. I have over the past few years done several
|
||||
things in this area including talks at universities, presentations at
|
||||
meetups, blogging and other things that aim to simplify this and make
|
||||
the 'newcomer experience' a lot better. This is something I promise to
|
||||
continue if elected to the TC.
|
||||
|
||||
A significant part of my motivation for running for election for the
|
||||
TC is based on what was discussed at a leadership training for TC
|
||||
members that I attended in Ann Arbor last year.
|
||||
|
||||
I'm happy to see that the TC has taken a more assertive position on
|
||||
defining a vision, something which was discussed at length, and I
|
||||
believe long overdue. I have long advocated that the TC should take a
|
||||
more assertive and prescriptive approach towards the technical
|
||||
decisions that it makes, and this is something I promise to bring to
|
||||
the TC if elected.
|
||||
|
||||
I'm a strong proponent of allowing projects to make the right
|
||||
technical decisions for their own areas, but still see the value in a
|
||||
central governance structure. A part of the evolution of OpenStack
|
||||
that I welcome is the recent move to take positive action on the
|
||||
Golang issue, and to get work going to allow projects to choose a
|
||||
language other than Python.
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, I believe that the TC is in need of some 'new voices' and I
|
||||
promise to bring a new and different perspective to the deliberations
|
||||
of the TC.
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks,
|
||||
|
||||
-amrith
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user