b036e03faa
Please consider my candidacy for election to the TC. Change-Id: Ie15b0192c574150e6dc6159329845423fbe77542
117 lines
4.9 KiB
Plaintext
117 lines
4.9 KiB
Plaintext
Greetings,
|
||
|
||
I’m writing to submit my candidacy for election to the OpenStack
|
||
Technical Committee.
|
||
|
||
By way of introduction, my name is Amrith Kumar, I am the Chief
|
||
Technology Officer[1] at Tesora[2], a company focused on
|
||
Database-as-a-Service and the OpenStack Trove project.
|
||
|
||
As OpenStack evolves, so too should the Technical Committee. I believe
|
||
that the Technical Committee has a very high representation from the
|
||
core (nova, cinder, swift, glance, neutron, ...) projects, and there
|
||
needs to be more representation of the other projects in OpenStack
|
||
that are not part of this core (trove, sahara, ...). I believe that
|
||
the future success of OpenStack depends heavily on the successful
|
||
integration of these non-core projects, and the ease with which people
|
||
can deploy the core and non-core components of OpenStack.
|
||
|
||
If elected, I would bring a different perspective to the TC, one that
|
||
would broaden the representation of the non-core projects on the
|
||
Technical Committee.
|
||
|
||
Here is a quick summary of what I do relative to OpenStack, and why I
|
||
believe that you should consider my candidacy for TC
|
||
|
||
- active contributor and member of the core review team for Trove,
|
||
and spend all of my time on upstream development activities
|
||
related to OpenStack Trove. I am also a periodic contributor to
|
||
Oslo and the Trove liaison to Oslo
|
||
|
||
- authored the book on OpenStack Trove[3] along with Doug Shelley,
|
||
a co-worker and contributor to the Trove project
|
||
|
||
- OpenStack evangelism and outreach activities include
|
||
|
||
- Frequent participant and speaker at a variety of technical
|
||
events where I have spoken about OpenStack in general, and
|
||
sometimes Trove in particular
|
||
|
||
- Frequent participant in the Boston OpenStack Meetup,
|
||
presenter at a number of OpenStack Meetups all over the
|
||
country
|
||
|
||
- Actively promoting an initiative called “OpenStack in the
|
||
Classroom” [4] that I shared on the mailing list several
|
||
months ago. I have had good luck promoting it to a number
|
||
of colleges in the Boston area
|
||
|
||
- chosen by the OpenStack Foundation to serve as part of a global
|
||
committee of OpenStack experts developing a list of Domains and
|
||
Tasks essential for OpenStack administration professionals.
|
||
|
||
I believe firmly that the long term success of OpenStack depends on
|
||
the ease with which users are able to deploy and bring a cloud into
|
||
production. The big tent proposal was a very important step in that
|
||
direction but much remains to be done.
|
||
|
||
It is essential that we make it easier for users to deploy and use
|
||
other projects that are not part of the “core”, projects like Trove,
|
||
Sahara, Magnum, and so on.
|
||
|
||
A current example of the kind(s) of issues that I believe to exist
|
||
relates to the creation of protected ‘service resources’ that make it
|
||
possible for services to provision servers and storage in tenant
|
||
context while making it impossible for tenants to manipulate these
|
||
resources other than through the service that provisioned them
|
||
[5],[6].
|
||
|
||
This is an example of a specific initiative that I have been working
|
||
with members of the community to address.
|
||
|
||
This is a feature that will have to be provided by the core projects
|
||
and the beneficiaries are the non-core projects that request these
|
||
'service resources'.
|
||
|
||
I believe that it is imperative that the Technical Committee take a
|
||
leadership role in addressing these kinds of issues, as it did in the
|
||
big-tent approach.
|
||
|
||
The activities of the TC align closely with my own skills and past
|
||
experience which include architecting and implementing complex
|
||
computer architecture, with flexible and extensible API's and then
|
||
working with diverse teams to deliver the software that implements
|
||
these. I work very effectively as a facilitator of teams and in
|
||
helping groups of people work together.
|
||
|
||
I believe that I will be able to work with the rest of the team and
|
||
drive this kind of activity to successful completion. I am committed
|
||
to the success of OpenStack and would like to contribute further as a
|
||
member of the Technical Committee.
|
||
|
||
I look forward to your support in the upcoming election, and I thank
|
||
the outgoing members of the TC for their hard work and the solid
|
||
foundation that they have laid for future committees.
|
||
|
||
Here are some more links:
|
||
|
||
Official Candidacy: [this review]
|
||
Review history: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:9664,n,z
|
||
Commit history: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/owner:9664,n,z
|
||
Stackalytics: http://stackalytics.com/?user_id=amrith&release=all
|
||
Foundation: http://www.openstack.org/community/members/profile/15733
|
||
Freenode: amrith
|
||
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/amrith
|
||
|
||
Thank you,
|
||
|
||
-amrith
|
||
|
||
[1] http://www.tesora.com/people/amrith-kumar/
|
||
[2] http://www.tesora.com/
|
||
[3] http://www.apress.com/9781484212226
|
||
[4] http://openstack.markmail.org/thread/ukckrielspbrjejp
|
||
[5] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/186357/
|
||
[6] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/203880/
|
||
|