9a10f76b72
Change-Id: I2ff2ee5606ab2390874c775e219f4dcb62242184
31 lines
1.5 KiB
Plaintext
31 lines
1.5 KiB
Plaintext
Hi everyone,
|
||
|
||
I’m announcing my candidacy for PTL of Horizon for the Pike release cycle.
|
||
|
||
Over the next 6 months I’d like to:
|
||
|
||
- Narrow the blueprint/feature scope to ensure we focus on high priority areas,
|
||
like non-performant panels or buggy user experiences. In previous cycles, our
|
||
attitude has been to opportunistically accept features as they were developed;
|
||
however, given the rapid decline in review count I don’t believe this is
|
||
maintainable going forward. I’d like to follow a similar structure to Neutron,
|
||
with a smaller feature count that is well understood by core reviewers and
|
||
other time being spent on addressing bugs. We’ll do this by accepting only a
|
||
handful of blueprints at a time, and designating a core reviewer to monitor
|
||
each blueprints progress.
|
||
|
||
- Continue working with Keystone via cross-project meetings to fix key bugs in
|
||
Identity management. Over the past couple of cycles we’ve closed some long
|
||
standing Keystone interaction bugs in Horizon, and I’d like to continue this
|
||
effort. There are several patches still to work on in Horizon and Django
|
||
OpenStack Auth, and we should make sure we capitalise on the excellent help
|
||
from the Keystone community to improve the Horizon Identity panels.
|
||
|
||
- Keep up community interaction. Richard has maintained a list of priority
|
||
patches through Ocata, as well as sending out weekly meeting reminders and
|
||
progress updates. I’ll continue this work, and hold bug days to highlight
|
||
key issues to invest our time in.
|
||
|
||
Thanks,
|
||
Rob
|