Merge "Expose allocation owner to additional policy checks"
This commit is contained in:
commit
55a29c31fa
@ -334,8 +334,7 @@ class AllocationsController(pecan.rest.RestController):
|
||||
of the resource to be returned.
|
||||
:param owner: Filter by owner.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
cdict = api.request.context.to_policy_values()
|
||||
policy.authorize('baremetal:allocation:get', cdict, cdict)
|
||||
owner = api_utils.check_list_policy('allocation', owner)
|
||||
|
||||
self._check_allowed_allocation_fields(fields)
|
||||
if owner is not None and not api_utils.allow_allocation_owner():
|
||||
@ -355,13 +354,10 @@ class AllocationsController(pecan.rest.RestController):
|
||||
:param fields: Optional, a list with a specified set of fields
|
||||
of the resource to be returned.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
cdict = api.request.context.to_policy_values()
|
||||
policy.authorize('baremetal:allocation:get', cdict, cdict)
|
||||
|
||||
rpc_allocation = api_utils.check_allocation_policy_and_retrieve(
|
||||
'baremetal:allocation:get', allocation_ident)
|
||||
self._check_allowed_allocation_fields(fields)
|
||||
|
||||
rpc_allocation = api_utils.get_rpc_allocation_with_suffix(
|
||||
allocation_ident)
|
||||
return Allocation.convert_with_links(rpc_allocation, fields=fields)
|
||||
|
||||
@METRICS.timer('AllocationsController.post')
|
||||
@ -485,9 +481,10 @@ class AllocationsController(pecan.rest.RestController):
|
||||
if not api_utils.allow_allocation_update():
|
||||
raise webob_exc.HTTPMethodNotAllowed(_(
|
||||
"The API version does not allow updating allocations"))
|
||||
|
||||
context = api.request.context
|
||||
cdict = context.to_policy_values()
|
||||
policy.authorize('baremetal:allocation:update', cdict, cdict)
|
||||
rpc_allocation = api_utils.check_allocation_policy_and_retrieve(
|
||||
'baremetal:allocation:update', allocation_ident)
|
||||
self._validate_patch(patch)
|
||||
names = api_utils.get_patch_values(patch, '/name')
|
||||
for name in names:
|
||||
@ -495,8 +492,6 @@ class AllocationsController(pecan.rest.RestController):
|
||||
msg = _("Cannot update allocation with invalid name "
|
||||
"'%(name)s'") % {'name': name}
|
||||
raise exception.Invalid(msg)
|
||||
rpc_allocation = api_utils.get_rpc_allocation_with_suffix(
|
||||
allocation_ident)
|
||||
allocation_dict = rpc_allocation.as_dict()
|
||||
allocation = Allocation(**api_utils.apply_jsonpatch(allocation_dict,
|
||||
patch))
|
||||
@ -528,11 +523,8 @@ class AllocationsController(pecan.rest.RestController):
|
||||
:param allocation_ident: UUID or logical name of an allocation.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
context = api.request.context
|
||||
cdict = context.to_policy_values()
|
||||
policy.authorize('baremetal:allocation:delete', cdict, cdict)
|
||||
|
||||
rpc_allocation = api_utils.get_rpc_allocation_with_suffix(
|
||||
allocation_ident)
|
||||
rpc_allocation = api_utils.check_allocation_policy_and_retrieve(
|
||||
'baremetal:allocation:delete', allocation_ident)
|
||||
if rpc_allocation.node_id:
|
||||
node_uuid = objects.Node.get_by_id(api.request.context,
|
||||
rpc_allocation.node_id).uuid
|
||||
|
@ -1836,7 +1836,7 @@ class NodesController(rest.RestController):
|
||||
with description field contains matching
|
||||
value.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
owner = api_utils.check_node_list_policy(owner)
|
||||
owner = api_utils.check_list_policy('node', owner)
|
||||
|
||||
api_utils.check_allow_specify_fields(fields)
|
||||
api_utils.check_allowed_fields(fields)
|
||||
@ -1913,7 +1913,7 @@ class NodesController(rest.RestController):
|
||||
with description field contains matching
|
||||
value.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
owner = api_utils.check_node_list_policy(owner)
|
||||
owner = api_utils.check_list_policy('node', owner)
|
||||
|
||||
api_utils.check_for_invalid_state_and_allow_filter(provision_state)
|
||||
api_utils.check_allow_specify_driver(driver)
|
||||
@ -2139,7 +2139,8 @@ class NodesController(rest.RestController):
|
||||
# check if updating a provisioned node's owner is allowed
|
||||
if rpc_node.provision_state == ir_states.ACTIVE:
|
||||
try:
|
||||
api_utils.check_node_policy(
|
||||
api_utils.check_owner_policy(
|
||||
'node',
|
||||
'baremetal:node:update_owner_provisioned',
|
||||
rpc_node['owner'])
|
||||
except exception.HTTPForbidden:
|
||||
|
@ -1167,18 +1167,19 @@ def check_policy(policy_name):
|
||||
policy.authorize(policy_name, cdict, cdict)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def check_node_policy(policy_name, node_owner):
|
||||
"""Check if the specified policy authorizes this request on a node.
|
||||
def check_owner_policy(object_type, policy_name, owner):
|
||||
"""Check if the policy authorizes this request on an object.
|
||||
|
||||
:param: object_type: type of object being checked
|
||||
:param: policy_name: Name of the policy to check.
|
||||
:param: node_owner: the node owner
|
||||
:param: owner: the owner
|
||||
|
||||
:raises: HTTPForbidden if the policy forbids access.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
cdict = api.request.context.to_policy_values()
|
||||
|
||||
target_dict = dict(cdict)
|
||||
target_dict['node.owner'] = node_owner
|
||||
target_dict[object_type + '.owner'] = owner
|
||||
policy.authorize(policy_name, target_dict, cdict)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1206,27 +1207,52 @@ def check_node_policy_and_retrieve(policy_name, node_ident,
|
||||
policy.authorize(policy_name, cdict, cdict)
|
||||
raise
|
||||
|
||||
check_node_policy(policy_name, rpc_node['owner'])
|
||||
check_owner_policy('node', policy_name, rpc_node['owner'])
|
||||
return rpc_node
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def check_node_list_policy(owner=None):
|
||||
"""Check if the specified policy authorizes this request on a node.
|
||||
def check_allocation_policy_and_retrieve(policy_name, allocation_ident):
|
||||
"""Check if the specified policy authorizes request on allocation.
|
||||
|
||||
:param: policy_name: Name of the policy to check.
|
||||
:param: allocation_ident: the UUID or logical name of a node.
|
||||
|
||||
:raises: HTTPForbidden if the policy forbids access.
|
||||
:raises: AllocationNotFound if the node is not found.
|
||||
:return: RPC node identified by node_ident
|
||||
"""
|
||||
try:
|
||||
rpc_allocation = get_rpc_allocation_with_suffix(
|
||||
allocation_ident)
|
||||
except exception.AllocationNotFound:
|
||||
# don't expose non-existence unless requester
|
||||
# has generic access to policy
|
||||
cdict = api.request.context.to_policy_values()
|
||||
policy.authorize(policy_name, cdict, cdict)
|
||||
raise
|
||||
|
||||
check_owner_policy('allocation', policy_name, rpc_allocation['owner'])
|
||||
return rpc_allocation
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def check_list_policy(object_type, owner=None):
|
||||
"""Check if the list policy authorizes this request on an object.
|
||||
|
||||
:param: object_type: type of object being checked
|
||||
:param: owner: owner filter for list query, if any
|
||||
|
||||
:raises: HTTPForbidden if the policy forbids access.
|
||||
:raises: NodeNotFound if the node is not found.
|
||||
:return: owner that should be used for list query, if needed
|
||||
"""
|
||||
cdict = api.request.context.to_policy_values()
|
||||
try:
|
||||
policy.authorize('baremetal:node:list_all', cdict, cdict)
|
||||
policy.authorize('baremetal:%s:list_all' % object_type,
|
||||
cdict, cdict)
|
||||
except exception.HTTPForbidden:
|
||||
project_owner = cdict.get('project_id')
|
||||
if (not project_owner or (owner and owner != project_owner)):
|
||||
raise
|
||||
policy.authorize('baremetal:node:list', cdict, cdict)
|
||||
policy.authorize('baremetal:%s:list' % object_type, cdict, cdict)
|
||||
return project_owner
|
||||
return owner
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -66,6 +66,9 @@ default_policies = [
|
||||
policy.RuleDefault('is_node_owner',
|
||||
'project_id:%(node.owner)s',
|
||||
description='Owner of node'),
|
||||
policy.RuleDefault('is_allocation_owner',
|
||||
'project_id:%(allocation.owner)s',
|
||||
description='Owner of allocation'),
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
# NOTE(deva): to follow policy-in-code spec, we define defaults for
|
||||
@ -437,9 +440,18 @@ allocation_policies = [
|
||||
'baremetal:allocation:get',
|
||||
'rule:is_admin or rule:is_observer',
|
||||
'Retrieve Allocation records',
|
||||
[{'path': '/allocations', 'method': 'GET'},
|
||||
{'path': '/allocations/{allocation_id}', 'method': 'GET'},
|
||||
[{'path': '/allocations/{allocation_id}', 'method': 'GET'},
|
||||
{'path': '/nodes/{node_ident}/allocation', 'method': 'GET'}]),
|
||||
policy.DocumentedRuleDefault(
|
||||
'baremetal:allocation:list',
|
||||
'rule:baremetal:allocation:get',
|
||||
'Retrieve multiple Allocation records, filtered by owner',
|
||||
[{'path': '/allocations', 'method': 'GET'}]),
|
||||
policy.DocumentedRuleDefault(
|
||||
'baremetal:allocation:list_all',
|
||||
'rule:baremetal:allocation:get',
|
||||
'Retrieve multiple Allocation records',
|
||||
[{'path': '/allocations', 'method': 'GET'}]),
|
||||
policy.DocumentedRuleDefault(
|
||||
'baremetal:allocation:create',
|
||||
'rule:is_admin',
|
||||
|
@ -268,6 +268,78 @@ class TestListAllocations(test_api_base.BaseApiTest):
|
||||
expect_errors=True)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(http_client.NOT_FOUND, response.status_int)
|
||||
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(policy, 'authorize', spec=True)
|
||||
def test_allocation_get_all_forbidden(self, mock_authorize):
|
||||
def mock_authorize_function(rule, target, creds):
|
||||
raise exception.HTTPForbidden(resource='fake')
|
||||
mock_authorize.side_effect = mock_authorize_function
|
||||
|
||||
response = self.get_json('/allocations', expect_errors=True,
|
||||
headers={
|
||||
api_base.Version.string: '1.60',
|
||||
'X-Project-Id': '12345'
|
||||
})
|
||||
self.assertEqual(http_client.FORBIDDEN, response.status_int)
|
||||
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(policy, 'authorize', spec=True)
|
||||
def test_allocation_get_all_forbidden_no_project(self, mock_authorize):
|
||||
def mock_authorize_function(rule, target, creds):
|
||||
if rule == 'baremetal:allocation:list_all':
|
||||
raise exception.HTTPForbidden(resource='fake')
|
||||
return True
|
||||
mock_authorize.side_effect = mock_authorize_function
|
||||
|
||||
response = self.get_json('/allocations', expect_errors=True,
|
||||
headers={
|
||||
api_base.Version.string: '1.59',
|
||||
})
|
||||
self.assertEqual(http_client.FORBIDDEN, response.status_int)
|
||||
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(policy, 'authorize', spec=True)
|
||||
def test_allocation_get_all_forbid_owner_proj_mismatch(
|
||||
self, mock_authorize):
|
||||
def mock_authorize_function(rule, target, creds):
|
||||
if rule == 'baremetal:allocation:list_all':
|
||||
raise exception.HTTPForbidden(resource='fake')
|
||||
return True
|
||||
mock_authorize.side_effect = mock_authorize_function
|
||||
|
||||
response = self.get_json('/allocations?owner=54321',
|
||||
expect_errors=True,
|
||||
headers={
|
||||
api_base.Version.string: '1.60',
|
||||
'X-Project-Id': '12345'
|
||||
})
|
||||
self.assertEqual(http_client.FORBIDDEN, response.status_int)
|
||||
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(policy, 'authorize', spec=True)
|
||||
def test_allocation_get_all_non_admin(self, mock_authorize):
|
||||
def mock_authorize_function(rule, target, creds):
|
||||
if rule == 'baremetal:allocation:list_all':
|
||||
raise exception.HTTPForbidden(resource='fake')
|
||||
return True
|
||||
mock_authorize.side_effect = mock_authorize_function
|
||||
|
||||
allocations = []
|
||||
for id in range(5):
|
||||
allocation = obj_utils.create_test_allocation(
|
||||
self.context,
|
||||
uuid=uuidutils.generate_uuid(),
|
||||
owner='12345')
|
||||
allocations.append(allocation.uuid)
|
||||
for id in range(2):
|
||||
allocation = obj_utils.create_test_allocation(
|
||||
self.context,
|
||||
uuid=uuidutils.generate_uuid())
|
||||
|
||||
data = self.get_json('/allocations', headers={
|
||||
api_base.Version.string: '1.60',
|
||||
'X-Project-Id': '12345'})
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(allocations), len(data['allocations']))
|
||||
|
||||
uuids = [n['uuid'] for n in data['allocations']]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(sorted(allocations), sorted(uuids))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_sort_key(self):
|
||||
allocations = []
|
||||
for id_ in range(3):
|
||||
|
@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ class TestExposedAPIMethodsCheckPolicy(test_base.TestCase):
|
||||
src = inspect.getsource(func)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
('api_utils.check_node_policy_and_retrieve' in src) or
|
||||
('api_utils.check_node_list_policy' in src) or
|
||||
('api_utils.check_list_policy' in src) or
|
||||
('self._get_node_and_topic' in src) or
|
||||
('api_utils.check_port_policy_and_retrieve' in src) or
|
||||
('api_utils.check_port_list_policy' in src) or
|
||||
|
@ -797,30 +797,30 @@ class TestPortgroupIdent(base.TestCase):
|
||||
self.invalid_name)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestCheckNodePolicy(base.TestCase):
|
||||
class TestCheckOwnerPolicy(base.TestCase):
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
super(TestCheckNodePolicy, self).setUp()
|
||||
super(TestCheckOwnerPolicy, self).setUp()
|
||||
self.valid_node_uuid = uuidutils.generate_uuid()
|
||||
self.node = test_api_utils.post_get_test_node()
|
||||
self.node['owner'] = '12345'
|
||||
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(api, 'request', spec_set=["context", "version"])
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(policy, 'authorize', spec=True)
|
||||
def test_check_node_policy(
|
||||
def test_check_owner_policy(
|
||||
self, mock_authorize, mock_pr
|
||||
):
|
||||
mock_pr.version.minor = 50
|
||||
mock_pr.context.to_policy_values.return_value = {}
|
||||
|
||||
utils.check_node_policy(
|
||||
'fake_policy', self.node['owner']
|
||||
utils.check_owner_policy(
|
||||
'node', 'fake_policy', self.node['owner']
|
||||
)
|
||||
mock_authorize.assert_called_once_with(
|
||||
'fake_policy', {'node.owner': '12345'}, {})
|
||||
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(api, 'request', spec_set=["context", "version"])
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(policy, 'authorize', spec=True)
|
||||
def test_check_node_policy_forbidden(
|
||||
def test_check_owner_policy_forbidden(
|
||||
self, mock_authorize, mock_pr
|
||||
):
|
||||
mock_pr.version.minor = 50
|
||||
@ -829,7 +829,8 @@ class TestCheckNodePolicy(base.TestCase):
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertRaises(
|
||||
exception.HTTPForbidden,
|
||||
utils.check_node_policy,
|
||||
utils.check_owner_policy,
|
||||
'node',
|
||||
'fake-policy',
|
||||
self.node['owner']
|
||||
)
|
||||
@ -936,10 +937,89 @@ class TestCheckNodePolicyAndRetrieve(base.TestCase):
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestCheckNodeListPolicy(base.TestCase):
|
||||
class TestCheckAllocationPolicyAndRetrieve(base.TestCase):
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
super(TestCheckAllocationPolicyAndRetrieve, self).setUp()
|
||||
self.valid_allocation_uuid = uuidutils.generate_uuid()
|
||||
self.allocation = test_api_utils.allocation_post_data()
|
||||
self.allocation['owner'] = '12345'
|
||||
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(api, 'request', spec_set=["context", "version"])
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(policy, 'authorize', spec=True)
|
||||
def test_check_node_list_policy(
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(utils, 'get_rpc_allocation_with_suffix')
|
||||
def test_check_node_policy_and_retrieve(
|
||||
self, mock_graws, mock_authorize, mock_pr
|
||||
):
|
||||
mock_pr.version.minor = 60
|
||||
mock_pr.context.to_policy_values.return_value = {}
|
||||
mock_graws.return_value = self.allocation
|
||||
|
||||
rpc_allocation = utils.check_allocation_policy_and_retrieve(
|
||||
'fake_policy', self.valid_allocation_uuid
|
||||
)
|
||||
mock_graws.assert_called_once_with(self.valid_allocation_uuid)
|
||||
mock_authorize.assert_called_once_with(
|
||||
'fake_policy', {'allocation.owner': '12345'}, {})
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.allocation, rpc_allocation)
|
||||
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(api, 'request', spec_set=["context"])
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(policy, 'authorize', spec=True)
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(utils, 'get_rpc_allocation_with_suffix')
|
||||
def test_check_alloc_policy_and_retrieve_no_alloc_policy_forbidden(
|
||||
self, mock_graws, mock_authorize, mock_pr
|
||||
):
|
||||
mock_pr.context.to_policy_values.return_value = {}
|
||||
mock_authorize.side_effect = exception.HTTPForbidden(resource='fake')
|
||||
mock_graws.side_effect = exception.AllocationNotFound(
|
||||
allocation=self.valid_allocation_uuid)
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertRaises(
|
||||
exception.HTTPForbidden,
|
||||
utils.check_allocation_policy_and_retrieve,
|
||||
'fake-policy',
|
||||
self.valid_allocation_uuid
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(api, 'request', spec_set=["context"])
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(policy, 'authorize', spec=True)
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(utils, 'get_rpc_allocation_with_suffix')
|
||||
def test_check_allocation_policy_and_retrieve_no_allocation(
|
||||
self, mock_graws, mock_authorize, mock_pr
|
||||
):
|
||||
mock_pr.context.to_policy_values.return_value = {}
|
||||
mock_graws.side_effect = exception.AllocationNotFound(
|
||||
allocation=self.valid_allocation_uuid)
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertRaises(
|
||||
exception.AllocationNotFound,
|
||||
utils.check_allocation_policy_and_retrieve,
|
||||
'fake-policy',
|
||||
self.valid_allocation_uuid
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(api, 'request', spec_set=["context", "version"])
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(policy, 'authorize', spec=True)
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(utils, 'get_rpc_allocation_with_suffix')
|
||||
def test_check_allocation_policy_and_retrieve_policy_forbidden(
|
||||
self, mock_graws, mock_authorize, mock_pr
|
||||
):
|
||||
mock_pr.version.minor = 50
|
||||
mock_pr.context.to_policy_values.return_value = {}
|
||||
mock_authorize.side_effect = exception.HTTPForbidden(resource='fake')
|
||||
mock_graws.return_value = self.allocation
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertRaises(
|
||||
exception.HTTPForbidden,
|
||||
utils.check_allocation_policy_and_retrieve,
|
||||
'fake-policy',
|
||||
self.valid_allocation_uuid
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestCheckListPolicy(base.TestCase):
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(api, 'request', spec_set=["context", "version"])
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(policy, 'authorize', spec=True)
|
||||
def test_check_list_policy(
|
||||
self, mock_authorize, mock_pr
|
||||
):
|
||||
mock_pr.context.to_policy_values.return_value = {
|
||||
@ -947,12 +1027,12 @@ class TestCheckNodeListPolicy(base.TestCase):
|
||||
}
|
||||
mock_pr.version.minor = 50
|
||||
|
||||
owner = utils.check_node_list_policy()
|
||||
owner = utils.check_list_policy('node')
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(owner)
|
||||
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(api, 'request', spec_set=["context", "version"])
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(policy, 'authorize', spec=True)
|
||||
def test_check_node_list_policy_with_owner(
|
||||
def test_check_list_policy_with_owner(
|
||||
self, mock_authorize, mock_pr
|
||||
):
|
||||
mock_pr.context.to_policy_values.return_value = {
|
||||
@ -960,12 +1040,12 @@ class TestCheckNodeListPolicy(base.TestCase):
|
||||
}
|
||||
mock_pr.version.minor = 50
|
||||
|
||||
owner = utils.check_node_list_policy('12345')
|
||||
owner = utils.check_list_policy('node', '12345')
|
||||
self.assertEqual(owner, '12345')
|
||||
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(api, 'request', spec_set=["context", "version"])
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(policy, 'authorize', spec=True)
|
||||
def test_check_node_list_policy_forbidden(
|
||||
def test_check_list_policy_forbidden(
|
||||
self, mock_authorize, mock_pr
|
||||
):
|
||||
def mock_authorize_function(rule, target, creds):
|
||||
@ -978,12 +1058,13 @@ class TestCheckNodeListPolicy(base.TestCase):
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertRaises(
|
||||
exception.HTTPForbidden,
|
||||
utils.check_node_list_policy,
|
||||
utils.check_list_policy,
|
||||
'node'
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(api, 'request', spec_set=["context", "version"])
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(policy, 'authorize', spec=True)
|
||||
def test_check_node_list_policy_forbidden_no_project(
|
||||
def test_check_list_policy_forbidden_no_project(
|
||||
self, mock_authorize, mock_pr
|
||||
):
|
||||
def mock_authorize_function(rule, target, creds):
|
||||
@ -996,12 +1077,13 @@ class TestCheckNodeListPolicy(base.TestCase):
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertRaises(
|
||||
exception.HTTPForbidden,
|
||||
utils.check_node_list_policy,
|
||||
utils.check_list_policy,
|
||||
'node'
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(api, 'request', spec_set=["context", "version"])
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(policy, 'authorize', spec=True)
|
||||
def test_check_node_list_policy_non_admin(
|
||||
def test_check_list_policy_non_admin(
|
||||
self, mock_authorize, mock_pr
|
||||
):
|
||||
def mock_authorize_function(rule, target, creds):
|
||||
@ -1014,12 +1096,12 @@ class TestCheckNodeListPolicy(base.TestCase):
|
||||
}
|
||||
mock_pr.version.minor = 50
|
||||
|
||||
owner = utils.check_node_list_policy()
|
||||
owner = utils.check_list_policy('node')
|
||||
self.assertEqual(owner, '12345')
|
||||
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(api, 'request', spec_set=["context", "version"])
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(policy, 'authorize', spec=True)
|
||||
def test_check_node_list_policy_non_admin_owner_proj_mismatch(
|
||||
def test_check_list_policy_non_admin_owner_proj_mismatch(
|
||||
self, mock_authorize, mock_pr
|
||||
):
|
||||
def mock_authorize_function(rule, target, creds):
|
||||
@ -1034,7 +1116,8 @@ class TestCheckNodeListPolicy(base.TestCase):
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertRaises(
|
||||
exception.HTTPForbidden,
|
||||
utils.check_node_list_policy,
|
||||
utils.check_list_policy,
|
||||
'node',
|
||||
'54321'
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -69,6 +69,19 @@ class PolicyInCodeTestCase(base.TestCase):
|
||||
self.assertTrue(policy.check('is_node_owner', target, c1))
|
||||
self.assertFalse(policy.check('is_node_owner', target, c2))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_is_allocation_owner(self):
|
||||
c1 = {'project_id': '1234',
|
||||
'project_name': 'demo',
|
||||
'project_domain_id': 'default'}
|
||||
c2 = {'project_id': '5678',
|
||||
'project_name': 'demo',
|
||||
'project_domain_id': 'default'}
|
||||
target = dict.copy(c1)
|
||||
target['allocation.owner'] = '1234'
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertTrue(policy.check('is_allocation_owner', target, c1))
|
||||
self.assertFalse(policy.check('is_allocation_owner', target, c2))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_node_get(self):
|
||||
creds = {'roles': ['baremetal_observer'], 'project_name': 'demo',
|
||||
'project_domain_id': 'default'}
|
||||
|
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
features:
|
||||
- |
|
||||
Adds ``is_allocation_owner`` policy rule, which can be applied to allocation
|
||||
get/update/delete rules. Also adds ``baremetal:allocation:list`` and
|
||||
``baremetal:allocation:list_all`` rules for listing owned allocations and all
|
||||
allocations. Default rules are unaffected, so default behavior is unchanged.
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user