Improve join by removing periodic jobs
* This patch removes the approach with DB polling needed to determine if a "join" task is ready to run. Instead of running a periodic scheduled job, each task completion now runs the algorithm that finds all potentially affected join tasks and schedules just one job (instead of a periodic job) to check their readiness. This solves a problem of system cascaded overloading in case of having many very large joins (when a workflow has many joins with many dependencies each). Previously, in such case Mistral created too many periodic jobs that just didn't let the workflow progress well, i.e. most CPU was used by scheduler to run those periodic jobs that very rarely switched "join" tasks to the RUNNING state. Change-Id: I5ebc44c7a3f95c868d653689dc5cea689c788cd0 Closes-Bug: #1799356
This commit is contained in:
parent
0b38cd8028
commit
1a4c599a4d
@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ def process(func):
|
||||
# NOTE(rakhmerov): Since we make RPC calls to the engine itself
|
||||
# we need to process the action queue asynchronously in a new
|
||||
# thread. Otherwise, if we have one engine process the engine
|
||||
# will may send a request to itself while already processing
|
||||
# may send a request to itself while already processing
|
||||
# another one. In conjunction with blocking RPC it will lead
|
||||
# to a deadlock (and RPC timeout).
|
||||
def _within_new_thread():
|
||||
|
@ -78,8 +78,7 @@ def run_task(wf_cmd):
|
||||
|
||||
return
|
||||
|
||||
if task.is_waiting() and (task.is_created() or task.is_state_changed()):
|
||||
_schedule_refresh_task_state(task.task_ex, 1)
|
||||
_check_affected_tasks(task)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def rerun_task(task_ex, wf_spec):
|
||||
@ -129,6 +128,10 @@ def _on_action_complete(action_ex):
|
||||
|
||||
wf_handler.force_fail_workflow(wf_ex, msg)
|
||||
|
||||
return
|
||||
|
||||
_check_affected_tasks(task)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@profiler.trace('task-handler-on-action-update', hide_args=True)
|
||||
def _on_action_update(action_ex):
|
||||
@ -186,6 +189,8 @@ def _on_action_update(action_ex):
|
||||
|
||||
return
|
||||
|
||||
_check_affected_tasks(task)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def force_fail_task(task_ex, msg):
|
||||
"""Forces the given task to fail.
|
||||
@ -238,6 +243,8 @@ def continue_task(task_ex):
|
||||
|
||||
return
|
||||
|
||||
_check_affected_tasks(task)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def complete_task(task_ex, state, state_info):
|
||||
wf_spec = spec_parser.get_workflow_spec_by_execution_id(
|
||||
@ -264,6 +271,33 @@ def complete_task(task_ex, state, state_info):
|
||||
|
||||
return
|
||||
|
||||
_check_affected_tasks(task)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _check_affected_tasks(task):
|
||||
if not task.is_completed():
|
||||
return
|
||||
|
||||
task_ex = task.task_ex
|
||||
|
||||
wf_ex = task_ex.workflow_execution
|
||||
|
||||
if states.is_completed(wf_ex.state):
|
||||
return
|
||||
|
||||
wf_spec = spec_parser.get_workflow_spec_by_execution_id(
|
||||
task_ex.workflow_execution_id
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
wf_ctrl = wf_base.get_controller(wf_ex, wf_spec)
|
||||
|
||||
affected_task_execs = wf_ctrl.find_indirectly_affected_task_executions(
|
||||
task_ex.name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
for t_ex in affected_task_execs:
|
||||
_schedule_refresh_task_state(t_ex)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _build_task_from_execution(wf_spec, task_ex):
|
||||
return _create_task(
|
||||
@ -350,9 +384,14 @@ def _refresh_task_state(task_ex_id):
|
||||
|
||||
wf_ctrl = wf_base.get_controller(wf_ex, wf_spec)
|
||||
|
||||
log_state = wf_ctrl.get_logical_task_state(
|
||||
task_ex
|
||||
)
|
||||
with db_api.named_lock(task_ex.id):
|
||||
db_api.refresh(task_ex)
|
||||
|
||||
if (states.is_completed(task_ex.state)
|
||||
or task_ex.state == states.RUNNING):
|
||||
return
|
||||
|
||||
log_state = wf_ctrl.get_logical_task_state(task_ex)
|
||||
|
||||
state = log_state.state
|
||||
state_info = log_state.state_info
|
||||
@ -365,23 +404,18 @@ def _refresh_task_state(task_ex_id):
|
||||
elif state == states.ERROR:
|
||||
complete_task(task_ex, state, state_info)
|
||||
elif state == states.WAITING:
|
||||
# Let's assume that a task takes 0.01 sec in average to complete
|
||||
# and based on this assumption calculate a time of the next check.
|
||||
# The estimation is very rough, of course, but this delay will be
|
||||
# decreasing as task preconditions will be completing which will
|
||||
# give a decent asymptotic approximation.
|
||||
# For example, if a 'join' task has 100 inbound incomplete tasks
|
||||
# then the next 'refresh_task_state' call will happen in 10
|
||||
# seconds. For 500 tasks it will be 50 seconds. The larger the
|
||||
# workflow is, the more beneficial this mechanism will be.
|
||||
delay = int(log_state.cardinality * 0.01)
|
||||
|
||||
_schedule_refresh_task_state(task_ex, max(1, delay))
|
||||
LOG.info(
|
||||
"Task execution is still in WAITING state"
|
||||
" [task_ex_id=%s, task_name=%s]",
|
||||
task_ex_id,
|
||||
task_ex.name
|
||||
)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
# Must never get here.
|
||||
raise RuntimeError(
|
||||
'Unexpected logical task state [task_ex_id=%s, task_name=%s, '
|
||||
'state=%s]' % (task_ex_id, task_ex.name, state)
|
||||
'Unexpected logical task state [task_ex_id=%s, '
|
||||
'task_name=%s, state=%s]' %
|
||||
(task_ex_id, task_ex.name, state)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -401,7 +435,7 @@ def _schedule_refresh_task_state(task_ex, delay=0):
|
||||
:param task_ex: Task execution.
|
||||
:param delay: Delay.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
key = 'th_c_t_s_a-%s' % task_ex.id
|
||||
key = _get_refresh_state_job_key(task_ex.id)
|
||||
|
||||
scheduler.schedule_call(
|
||||
None,
|
||||
@ -412,6 +446,10 @@ def _schedule_refresh_task_state(task_ex, delay=0):
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _get_refresh_state_job_key(task_ex_id):
|
||||
return 'th_r_t_s-%s' % task_ex_id
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@db_utils.retry_on_db_error
|
||||
@action_queue.process
|
||||
def _scheduled_on_action_complete(action_ex_id, wf_action):
|
||||
@ -492,7 +530,7 @@ def schedule_on_action_update(action_ex, delay=0):
|
||||
|
||||
return
|
||||
|
||||
key = 'th_on_a_c-%s' % action_ex.task_execution_id
|
||||
key = 'th_on_a_u-%s' % action_ex.task_execution_id
|
||||
|
||||
scheduler.schedule_call(
|
||||
None,
|
||||
|
@ -140,13 +140,14 @@ class EngineTestCase(base.DbTestCase):
|
||||
for t in w.task_executions:
|
||||
print(
|
||||
"\t%s [id=%s, state=%s, state_info=%s, processed=%s,"
|
||||
" published=%s]" %
|
||||
" published=%s, runtime_context=%s]" %
|
||||
(t.name,
|
||||
t.id,
|
||||
t.state,
|
||||
t.state_info,
|
||||
t.processed,
|
||||
t.published)
|
||||
t.published,
|
||||
t.runtime_context)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
child_execs = t.executions
|
||||
|
@ -873,18 +873,11 @@ class JoinEngineTest(base.EngineTestCase):
|
||||
state=states.WAITING
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
calls = db_api.get_delayed_calls()
|
||||
|
||||
mtd_name = 'mistral.engine.task_handler._refresh_task_state'
|
||||
|
||||
cnt = sum([1 for c in calls if c.target_method_name == mtd_name])
|
||||
|
||||
# There can be 2 calls with different value of 'processing' flag.
|
||||
self.assertTrue(cnt == 1 or cnt == 2)
|
||||
|
||||
# Stop the workflow.
|
||||
self.engine.stop_workflow(wf_ex.id, state=states.CANCELLED)
|
||||
|
||||
mtd_name = 'mistral.engine.task_handler._refresh_task_state'
|
||||
|
||||
self._await(
|
||||
lambda:
|
||||
len(db_api.get_delayed_calls(target_method_name=mtd_name)) == 0
|
||||
@ -931,18 +924,11 @@ class JoinEngineTest(base.EngineTestCase):
|
||||
state=states.WAITING
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
calls = db_api.get_delayed_calls()
|
||||
|
||||
mtd_name = 'mistral.engine.task_handler._refresh_task_state'
|
||||
|
||||
cnt = sum([1 for c in calls if c.target_method_name == mtd_name])
|
||||
|
||||
# There can be 2 calls with different value of 'processing' flag.
|
||||
self.assertTrue(cnt == 1 or cnt == 2)
|
||||
|
||||
# Stop the workflow.
|
||||
db_api.delete_workflow_execution(wf_ex.id)
|
||||
|
||||
mtd_name = 'mistral.engine.task_handler._refresh_task_state'
|
||||
|
||||
self._await(
|
||||
lambda:
|
||||
len(db_api.get_delayed_calls(target_method_name=mtd_name)) == 0
|
||||
|
@ -1025,8 +1025,6 @@ class SubworkflowPauseResumeTest(base.EngineTestCase):
|
||||
# Get objects for the parent workflow execution.
|
||||
wf_1_ex = self._assert_single_item(wf_execs, name='wb.wf1')
|
||||
|
||||
wf_1_task_execs = wf_1_ex.task_executions
|
||||
|
||||
wf_1_task_1_ex = self._assert_single_item(
|
||||
wf_1_ex.task_executions,
|
||||
name='task1'
|
||||
@ -1049,8 +1047,6 @@ class SubworkflowPauseResumeTest(base.EngineTestCase):
|
||||
wf_1_task_1_action_exs[0].id
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
wf_2_ex_1_task_execs = wf_2_ex_1.task_executions
|
||||
|
||||
wf_2_ex_1_task_1_ex = self._assert_single_item(
|
||||
wf_2_ex_1.task_executions,
|
||||
name='task1'
|
||||
@ -1064,8 +1060,6 @@ class SubworkflowPauseResumeTest(base.EngineTestCase):
|
||||
wf_1_task_1_action_exs[1].id
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
wf_2_ex_2_task_execs = wf_2_ex_2.task_executions
|
||||
|
||||
wf_2_ex_2_task_1_ex = self._assert_single_item(
|
||||
wf_2_ex_2.task_executions,
|
||||
name='task1'
|
||||
@ -1079,8 +1073,6 @@ class SubworkflowPauseResumeTest(base.EngineTestCase):
|
||||
wf_1_task_1_action_exs[2].id
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
wf_2_ex_3_task_execs = wf_2_ex_3.task_executions
|
||||
|
||||
wf_2_ex_3_task_1_ex = self._assert_single_item(
|
||||
wf_2_ex_3.task_executions,
|
||||
name='task1'
|
||||
@ -1093,8 +1085,6 @@ class SubworkflowPauseResumeTest(base.EngineTestCase):
|
||||
# Get objects for the wf3 subworkflow execution.
|
||||
wf_3_ex = self._assert_single_item(wf_execs, name='wb.wf3')
|
||||
|
||||
wf_3_task_execs = wf_3_ex.task_executions
|
||||
|
||||
wf_3_task_1_ex = self._assert_single_item(
|
||||
wf_3_ex.task_executions,
|
||||
name='task1'
|
||||
@ -1149,8 +1139,6 @@ class SubworkflowPauseResumeTest(base.EngineTestCase):
|
||||
# Get objects for the parent workflow execution.
|
||||
wf_1_ex = self._assert_single_item(wf_execs, name='wb.wf1')
|
||||
|
||||
wf_1_task_execs = wf_1_ex.task_executions
|
||||
|
||||
wf_1_task_1_ex = self._assert_single_item(
|
||||
wf_1_ex.task_executions,
|
||||
name='task1'
|
||||
@ -1173,8 +1161,6 @@ class SubworkflowPauseResumeTest(base.EngineTestCase):
|
||||
wf_1_task_1_action_exs[0].id
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
wf_2_ex_1_task_execs = wf_2_ex_1.task_executions
|
||||
|
||||
wf_2_ex_1_task_1_ex = self._assert_single_item(
|
||||
wf_2_ex_1.task_executions,
|
||||
name='task1'
|
||||
@ -1188,8 +1174,6 @@ class SubworkflowPauseResumeTest(base.EngineTestCase):
|
||||
wf_1_task_1_action_exs[1].id
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
wf_2_ex_2_task_execs = wf_2_ex_2.task_executions
|
||||
|
||||
wf_2_ex_2_task_1_ex = self._assert_single_item(
|
||||
wf_2_ex_2.task_executions,
|
||||
name='task1'
|
||||
@ -1203,8 +1187,6 @@ class SubworkflowPauseResumeTest(base.EngineTestCase):
|
||||
wf_1_task_1_action_exs[2].id
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
wf_2_ex_3_task_execs = wf_2_ex_3.task_executions
|
||||
|
||||
wf_2_ex_3_task_1_ex = self._assert_single_item(
|
||||
wf_2_ex_3.task_executions,
|
||||
name='task1'
|
||||
@ -1217,8 +1199,6 @@ class SubworkflowPauseResumeTest(base.EngineTestCase):
|
||||
# Get objects for the wf3 subworkflow execution.
|
||||
wf_3_ex = self._assert_single_item(wf_execs, name='wb.wf3')
|
||||
|
||||
wf_3_task_execs = wf_3_ex.task_executions
|
||||
|
||||
wf_3_task_1_ex = self._assert_single_item(
|
||||
wf_3_ex.task_executions,
|
||||
name='task1'
|
||||
@ -1292,8 +1272,6 @@ class SubworkflowPauseResumeTest(base.EngineTestCase):
|
||||
# Get objects for the parent workflow execution.
|
||||
wf_1_ex = self._assert_single_item(wf_execs, name='wb.wf1')
|
||||
|
||||
wf_1_task_execs = wf_1_ex.task_executions
|
||||
|
||||
wf_1_task_1_ex = self._assert_single_item(
|
||||
wf_1_ex.task_executions,
|
||||
name='task1'
|
||||
@ -1316,8 +1294,6 @@ class SubworkflowPauseResumeTest(base.EngineTestCase):
|
||||
wf_1_task_1_action_exs[0].id
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
wf_2_ex_1_task_execs = wf_2_ex_1.task_executions
|
||||
|
||||
wf_2_ex_1_task_1_ex = self._assert_single_item(
|
||||
wf_2_ex_1.task_executions,
|
||||
name='task1'
|
||||
@ -1331,8 +1307,6 @@ class SubworkflowPauseResumeTest(base.EngineTestCase):
|
||||
wf_1_task_1_action_exs[1].id
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
wf_2_ex_2_task_execs = wf_2_ex_2.task_executions
|
||||
|
||||
wf_2_ex_2_task_1_ex = self._assert_single_item(
|
||||
wf_2_ex_2.task_executions,
|
||||
name='task1'
|
||||
@ -1346,8 +1320,6 @@ class SubworkflowPauseResumeTest(base.EngineTestCase):
|
||||
wf_1_task_1_action_exs[2].id
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
wf_2_ex_3_task_execs = wf_2_ex_3.task_executions
|
||||
|
||||
wf_2_ex_3_task_1_ex = self._assert_single_item(
|
||||
wf_2_ex_3.task_executions,
|
||||
name='task1'
|
||||
@ -1360,8 +1332,6 @@ class SubworkflowPauseResumeTest(base.EngineTestCase):
|
||||
# Get objects for the wf3 subworkflow execution.
|
||||
wf_3_ex = self._assert_single_item(wf_execs, name='wb.wf3')
|
||||
|
||||
wf_3_task_execs = wf_3_ex.task_executions
|
||||
|
||||
wf_3_task_1_ex = self._assert_single_item(
|
||||
wf_3_ex.task_executions,
|
||||
name='task1'
|
||||
|
@ -167,6 +167,16 @@ class WorkflowController(object):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
raise NotImplementedError
|
||||
|
||||
@abc.abstractmethod
|
||||
def find_indirectly_affected_task_executions(self, task_name):
|
||||
"""Get a set of task executions indirectly affected by the given.
|
||||
|
||||
:param task_name: Task name.
|
||||
:return: Task executions that can be indirectly affected by a task
|
||||
identified by the given name.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
raise NotImplementedError
|
||||
|
||||
@abc.abstractmethod
|
||||
def is_error_handled_for(self, task_ex):
|
||||
"""Determines if error is handled for specific task.
|
||||
|
@ -191,6 +191,9 @@ class DirectWorkflowController(base.WorkflowController):
|
||||
|
||||
return self._get_join_logical_state(task_spec)
|
||||
|
||||
def find_indirectly_affected_task_executions(self, task_name):
|
||||
return self._find_indirectly_affected_created_joins(task_name)
|
||||
|
||||
def is_error_handled_for(self, task_ex):
|
||||
return bool(self.wf_spec.get_on_error_clause(task_ex.name))
|
||||
|
||||
@ -308,6 +311,54 @@ class DirectWorkflowController(base.WorkflowController):
|
||||
if not condition or expr.evaluate(condition, ctx)
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
@profiler.trace('direct-wf-controller-find-downstream-joins')
|
||||
def _find_indirectly_affected_created_joins(self, task_name, result=None,
|
||||
visited_task_names=None):
|
||||
visited_task_names = visited_task_names or set()
|
||||
|
||||
if task_name in visited_task_names:
|
||||
return
|
||||
|
||||
visited_task_names.add(task_name)
|
||||
|
||||
result = result or set()
|
||||
|
||||
def _process_clause(clause):
|
||||
for t_name, condition, params in clause:
|
||||
t_spec = self.wf_spec.get_tasks()[t_name]
|
||||
|
||||
# Encountered an engine command.
|
||||
if not t_spec:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
|
||||
if t_spec.get_join():
|
||||
# TODO(rakhmerov): This is a fundamental limitation
|
||||
# that prevents us having cycles within workflows
|
||||
# that contain joins because we assume that there
|
||||
# can be only one "join" task with a given name.
|
||||
t_ex = self._find_task_execution_by_name(t_name)
|
||||
|
||||
if t_ex:
|
||||
result.add(t_ex)
|
||||
|
||||
# If we found a "join" we don't need to go further
|
||||
# because completion of the found join will handle
|
||||
# other deeper joins.
|
||||
continue
|
||||
|
||||
# Recursion.
|
||||
self._find_indirectly_affected_created_joins(
|
||||
t_name,
|
||||
result=result,
|
||||
visited_task_names=visited_task_names
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
_process_clause(self.wf_spec.get_on_success_clause(task_name))
|
||||
_process_clause(self.wf_spec.get_on_error_clause(task_name))
|
||||
_process_clause(self.wf_spec.get_on_complete_clause(task_name))
|
||||
|
||||
return result
|
||||
|
||||
@profiler.trace('direct-wf-controller-get-join-logical-state')
|
||||
def _get_join_logical_state(self, task_spec):
|
||||
"""Evaluates logical state of 'join' task.
|
||||
|
@ -88,7 +88,8 @@ def find_task_executions_by_name(wf_ex_id, task_name):
|
||||
|
||||
:param wf_ex_id: Workflow execution id.
|
||||
:param task_name: Task name.
|
||||
:return: Task executions (possibly a cached value).
|
||||
:return: Task executions (possibly a cached value). The returned list
|
||||
may contain task execution clones not bound to the DB session.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
with _TASK_EX_CACHE_LOCK:
|
||||
t_execs = _TASK_EX_CACHE[wf_ex_id].get(task_name)
|
||||
@ -102,6 +103,8 @@ def find_task_executions_by_name(wf_ex_id, task_name):
|
||||
sort_keys=[] # disable sorting
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
t_execs = [t_ex.get_clone() for t_ex in t_execs]
|
||||
|
||||
# We can cache only finished tasks because they won't change.
|
||||
all_finished = (
|
||||
t_execs and
|
||||
|
@ -118,6 +118,9 @@ class ReverseWorkflowController(base.WorkflowController):
|
||||
# TODO(rakhmerov): Implement.
|
||||
return base.TaskLogicalState(task_ex.state, task_ex.state_info)
|
||||
|
||||
def find_indirectly_affected_task_executions(self, task_name):
|
||||
return set()
|
||||
|
||||
def is_error_handled_for(self, task_ex):
|
||||
return task_ex.state != states.ERROR
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
fixes:
|
||||
- |
|
||||
Removed DB polling from the logic that checks readiness of a "join" task
|
||||
which leads to situations when CPU was mostly occupied by scheduler that
|
||||
runs corresponding periodic jobs and that doesn't let the workflow move
|
||||
forward with a proper speed. That happens in case if a workflow has lots
|
||||
of "join" tasks with many dependencies. It's fixed now.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user