Merge "Add entry for Quality of Service (QoS)"
This commit is contained in:
commit
7f54582717
@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ Bandwidth I/O
|
||||
Incoming and outgoing traffic can be shaped independently. The
|
||||
bandwidth element can have at most, one inbound and at most, one
|
||||
outbound child element. If you leave any of these child elements
|
||||
out, no quality of service (QoS) is applied on that traffic
|
||||
out, no :term:`quality of service (QoS)` is applied on that traffic
|
||||
direction. So, if you want to shape only the network's incoming
|
||||
traffic, use inbound only (and vice versa). Each element has one
|
||||
mandatory attribute average, which specifies the average bit rate on
|
||||
|
@ -80,11 +80,11 @@ infrastructure.
|
||||
Performance tuning
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
Network level tuning for this workload is minimal. Quality-of-Service
|
||||
(QoS) applies to these workloads for a middle ground Class Selector
|
||||
depending on existing policies. It is higher than a best effort queue
|
||||
but lower than an Expedited Forwarding or Assured Forwarding queue.
|
||||
Since this type of application generates larger packets with
|
||||
Network level tuning for this workload is minimal. :term:`Quality of
|
||||
Service (QoS)` applies to these workloads for a middle ground Class
|
||||
Selector depending on existing policies. It is higher than a best effort
|
||||
queue but lower than an Expedited Forwarding or Assured Forwarding
|
||||
queue. Since this type of application generates larger packets with
|
||||
longer-lived connections, you can optimize bandwidth utilization for
|
||||
long duration TCP. Normal bandwidth planning applies here with regards
|
||||
to benchmarking a session's usage multiplied by the expected number of
|
||||
|
@ -138,9 +138,9 @@ their own. The exception to this expectation is the rare case of a massively
|
||||
scalable cloud infrastructure built for a private or government organization
|
||||
that has specific requirements.
|
||||
|
||||
High performance systems have SLA requirements for a minimum quality of service
|
||||
with regard to guaranteed uptime, latency, and bandwidth. The level of the
|
||||
SLA can have a significant impact on the network architecture and
|
||||
High performance systems have SLA requirements for a minimum :term:`quality of
|
||||
service (QoS)` with regard to guaranteed uptime, latency, and bandwidth. The
|
||||
level of the SLA can have a significant impact on the network architecture and
|
||||
requirements for redundancy in the systems.
|
||||
|
||||
Hybrid cloud designs must accommodate differences in SLAs between providers,
|
||||
|
@ -191,8 +191,8 @@ architecture include:
|
||||
* There are a variety of well tested tools, such as ICMP, to monitor and
|
||||
manage traffic.
|
||||
|
||||
* Layer-3 architectures enable the use of Quality of Service (QoS) to manage
|
||||
network performance.
|
||||
* Layer-3 architectures enable the use of :term:`quality of service (QoS)` to
|
||||
manage network performance.
|
||||
|
||||
Layer-3 architecture limitations
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
@ -297,8 +297,8 @@ have differences in implementation.
|
||||
To segregate traffic, allow applications to create a private tenant
|
||||
network for database and storage network traffic. Use a public network
|
||||
for services that require direct client access from the Internet. Upon
|
||||
segregating the traffic, consider quality of service (QoS) and security
|
||||
to ensure each network has the required level of service.
|
||||
segregating the traffic, consider :term:`quality of service (QoS)` and
|
||||
security to ensure each network has the required level of service.
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, consider the routing of network traffic. For some applications,
|
||||
develop a complex policy framework for routing. To create a routing
|
||||
@ -430,15 +430,16 @@ allows for better use of available bandwidth. Configure jumbo frames across the
|
||||
complete path the packets traverse. If one network component is not capable of
|
||||
handling jumbo frames then the entire path reverts to the default MTU.
|
||||
|
||||
Quality of Service (QoS) also has a great impact on network intensive workloads
|
||||
as it provides instant service to packets which have a higher priority due to
|
||||
the impact of poor network performance. In applications such as Voice over IP
|
||||
(VoIP), differentiated services code points are a near requirement for proper
|
||||
operation. You can also use QoS in the opposite direction for mixed workloads
|
||||
to prevent low priority but high bandwidth applications, for example backup
|
||||
services, video conferencing, or file sharing, from blocking bandwidth that is
|
||||
needed for the proper operation of other workloads. It is possible to tag file
|
||||
storage traffic as a lower class, such as best effort or scavenger, to allow
|
||||
the higher priority traffic through. In cases where regions within a cloud
|
||||
might be geographically distributed it may also be necessary to plan
|
||||
accordingly to implement WAN optimization to combat latency or packet loss.
|
||||
:term:`Quality of Service (QoS)` also has a great impact on network intensive
|
||||
workloads as it provides instant service to packets which have a higher
|
||||
priority due to the impact of poor network performance. In applications such as
|
||||
Voice over IP (VoIP), differentiated services code points are a near
|
||||
requirement for proper operation. You can also use QoS in the opposite
|
||||
direction for mixed workloads to prevent low priority but high bandwidth
|
||||
applications, for example backup services, video conferencing, or file sharing,
|
||||
from blocking bandwidth that is needed for the proper operation of other
|
||||
workloads. It is possible to tag file storage traffic as a lower class, such as
|
||||
best effort or scavenger, to allow the higher priority traffic through. In
|
||||
cases where regions within a cloud might be geographically distributed it may
|
||||
also be necessary to plan accordingly to implement WAN optimization to combat
|
||||
latency or packet loss.
|
||||
|
@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ across the complete path the packets traverse. If one network component
|
||||
is not capable of handling jumbo frames then the entire path reverts to
|
||||
the default MTU.
|
||||
|
||||
Quality of Service (QoS) also has a great impact on network intensive
|
||||
:term:`Quality of Service (QoS)` also has a great impact on network intensive
|
||||
workloads as it provides instant service to packets which have a higher
|
||||
priority due to the impact of poor network performance. In applications
|
||||
such as Voice over IP (VoIP), differentiated services code points are a
|
||||
|
@ -46,8 +46,8 @@ have differences in implementation.
|
||||
To segregate traffic, allow applications to create a private tenant
|
||||
network for database and storage network traffic. Use a public network
|
||||
for services that require direct client access from the internet. Upon
|
||||
segregating the traffic, consider quality of service (QoS) and security
|
||||
to ensure each network has the required level of service.
|
||||
segregating the traffic, consider :term:`quality of service (QoS)` and
|
||||
security to ensure each network has the required level of service.
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, consider the routing of network traffic. For some applications,
|
||||
develop a complex policy framework for routing. To create a routing
|
||||
|
@ -79,8 +79,8 @@ infrastructure.
|
||||
Performance tuning
|
||||
------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Network level tuning for this workload is minimal. Quality-of-Service
|
||||
(QoS) applies to these workloads for a middle ground Class Selector
|
||||
Network level tuning for this workload is minimal. :term:`Quality of Service
|
||||
(QoS)` applies to these workloads for a middle ground Class Selector
|
||||
depending on existing policies. It is higher than a best effort queue
|
||||
but lower than an Expedited Forwarding or Assured Forwarding queue.
|
||||
Since this type of application generates larger packets with
|
||||
|
@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ architecture include:
|
||||
* There are a variety of well tested tools, for example ICMP, to
|
||||
monitor and manage traffic.
|
||||
|
||||
* Layer-3 architectures enable the use of Quality of Service (QoS) to
|
||||
* Layer-3 architectures enable the use of :term:`quality of service (QoS)` to
|
||||
manage network performance.
|
||||
|
||||
Layer-3 architecture limitations
|
||||
|
@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ Depending on the application and use case, network-intensive OpenStack
|
||||
installations can have high availability requirements. Financial
|
||||
transaction systems have a much higher requirement for high availability
|
||||
than a development application. Use network availability technologies,
|
||||
for example quality of service (QoS), to improve the network performance
|
||||
of sensitive applications such as VoIP and video streaming.
|
||||
for example :term:`quality of service (QoS)`, to improve the network
|
||||
performance of sensitive applications such as VoIP and video streaming.
|
||||
|
||||
High performance systems have SLA requirements for a minimum QoS with
|
||||
regard to guaranteed uptime, latency, and bandwidth. The level of the
|
||||
|
@ -81,17 +81,17 @@ Virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI)
|
||||
Voice over IP (VoIP)
|
||||
This is sensitive to network congestion, latency, jitter, and other network
|
||||
characteristics. VoIP has a symmetrical traffic pattern and it requires
|
||||
network quality of service (QoS) for best performance. In addition, you can
|
||||
implement active queue management to deliver voice and multimedia content.
|
||||
Users are sensitive to latency and jitter fluctuations and can detect them
|
||||
at very low levels.
|
||||
network :term:`quality of service (QoS)` for best performance. In addition,
|
||||
you can implement active queue management to deliver voice and multimedia
|
||||
content. Users are sensitive to latency and jitter fluctuations and can detect
|
||||
them at very low levels.
|
||||
|
||||
Video Conference or web conference
|
||||
This is sensitive to network congestion, latency, jitter, and other network
|
||||
characteristics. Video Conferencing has a symmetrical traffic pattern, but
|
||||
unless the network is on an MPLS private network, it cannot use network
|
||||
quality of service (QoS) to improve performance. Similar to VoIP, users are
|
||||
sensitive to network performance issues even at low levels.
|
||||
:term:`quality of service (QoS)` to improve performance. Similar to VoIP,
|
||||
users are sensitive to network performance issues even at low levels.
|
||||
|
||||
High performance computing (HPC)
|
||||
This is a complex use case that requires careful consideration of the traffic
|
||||
|
@ -3009,6 +3009,16 @@ Q
|
||||
Message queue software supported by OpenStack; an alternative to
|
||||
RabbitMQ.
|
||||
|
||||
Quality of Service (QoS)
|
||||
|
||||
The ability to guarantee certain network or storage requirements to
|
||||
satisfy a Service Level Agreement (SLA) between an application provider
|
||||
and end users.
|
||||
Typically includes performance requirements like networking bandwidth,
|
||||
latency, jitter correction, and reliability as well as storage
|
||||
performance in Input/Output Operations Per Second (IOPS), throttling
|
||||
agreements, and performance expectations at peak load.
|
||||
|
||||
quarantine
|
||||
|
||||
If Object Storage finds objects, containers, or accounts that
|
||||
|
@ -7,14 +7,14 @@ Introduction
|
||||
|
||||
Blockbridge is software that transforms commodity infrastructure into
|
||||
secure multi-tenant storage that operates as a programmable service. It
|
||||
provides automatic encryption, secure deletion, quality of service,
|
||||
replication, and programmable security capabilities on your choice of
|
||||
hardware. Blockbridge uses micro-segmentation to provide isolation that
|
||||
allows you to concurrently operate OpenStack, Docker, and bare-metal
|
||||
workflows on shared resources. When used with OpenStack, isolated
|
||||
management domains are dynamically created on a per-project basis. All
|
||||
volumes and clones, within and between projects, are automatically
|
||||
cryptographically isolated and implement secure deletion.
|
||||
provides automatic encryption, secure deletion, :term:`quality of service
|
||||
(QoS)`, replication, and programmable security capabilities on your choice of
|
||||
hardware. Blockbridge uses micro-segmentation to provide isolation that allows
|
||||
you to concurrently operate OpenStack, Docker, and bare-metal workflows on
|
||||
shared resources. When used with OpenStack, isolated management domains are
|
||||
dynamically created on a per-project basis. All volumes and clones, within and
|
||||
between projects, are automatically cryptographically isolated and implement
|
||||
secure deletion.
|
||||
|
||||
Architecture reference
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
@ -104,8 +104,8 @@ Driver configuration
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
The HDS driver supports the concept of differentiated services (also
|
||||
referred as quality of service) by mapping volume types to services
|
||||
provided through HNAS.
|
||||
referred as :term:`quality of service (QoS)`) by mapping volume types to
|
||||
services provided through HNAS.
|
||||
|
||||
HNAS supports a variety of storage options and file system capabilities,
|
||||
which are selected through the definition of volume types and the use of
|
||||
|
@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ Priority Optimization license installed.
|
||||
|
||||
``hpe3par:vvs``
|
||||
The virtual volume set name that has been predefined by the Administrator
|
||||
with Quality of Service (QoS) rules associated to it. If you specify
|
||||
with :term:`quality of service (QoS)` rules associated to it. If you specify
|
||||
extra_specs ``hpe3par:vvs``, the qos_specs ``minIOPS``, ``maxIOPS``,
|
||||
``minBWS``, and ``maxBWS`` settings are ignored.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ X-IO volume driver
|
||||
The X-IO volume driver for OpenStack Block Storage enables ISE products to be
|
||||
managed by OpenStack Block Storage nodes. This driver can be configured to work
|
||||
with iSCSI and Fibre Channel storage protocols. The X-IO volume driver allows
|
||||
the cloud operator to take advantage of ISE features like Quality of Service
|
||||
(QOS) and Continuous Adaptive Data Placement (CADP). It also supports
|
||||
the cloud operator to take advantage of ISE features like :term:`Quality of
|
||||
Service (QOS)` and Continuous Adaptive Data Placement (CADP). It also supports
|
||||
creating thin volumes and specifying volume media affinity.
|
||||
|
||||
Requirements
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user