Precisions on the licensing requirements
Add some precision on reviewing licensing requirements when adding new dependencies. Change-Id: I46bda1f9792c4cb01860dca3c3dbcbb4a0ea9287
This commit is contained in:
parent
f8cf7eba89
commit
0cb0425d42
@ -275,7 +275,11 @@ For new Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
- Is the library license compatible?
|
||||
|
||||
The library should be licensed as described in `Licensing requirements`_.
|
||||
The library should be licensed as described in `Licensing requirements`_,
|
||||
and the license should be described in a comment on the same line as the
|
||||
added dependency. If you have doubts over licensing compatibility, like
|
||||
for example when adding a GPL test dependency, you can seek advice from
|
||||
Robert Collins (lifeless), Monty Taylor (mordred) or Jim Blair (jeblair).
|
||||
|
||||
- Is the library already packaged in the distros we target (Ubuntu
|
||||
latest / Fedora latest)?
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user